Jobs for people with low IQs

Seems we have a crisis of two Constitutions.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/0 ... reenfield/

Apparently Comrade Thomas-Greenfield is unaware of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution which "wove" it out of our Founding documents.

#HEILKAMALA

--
Boris Sukavich Blokhayev, Zampolit
Grand Inquisitor for the Democratic Natl. Committee's Politburo™

Zampolit Blokhayev wrote:Apparently Comrade Thomas-Greenfield is unaware of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution which [highlight=#ffff99]"wove"[/highlight] it out of our Founding documents.

#HEILKAMALA

--
Boris Sukavich Blokhayev, Zampolit
Grand Inquisitor for the Democratic Natl. Committee's Politburo™

Is that anything like the kind of woven crown Sheila Jackson Lee has?

Ivan?? You keep up on she of the woven crown status? Is this how the 13th Amendment was woven out of the Founding Documents?

Zampolit Blokhayev wrote:Apparently Comrade Thomas-Greenfield is unaware of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution which "wove" it out of our Founding documents.

Don't be surprised if what she means is a constitutional republic in and of itself is white supremacy.

Premier Cho Bai-Din teaches us that no amendment is sacred, therefore the 13th is subject to modification and revocation like all the rest. Womyn's rights to vote are history, Slavery and white supremacy will be reinstated, because like socialism and so many other things, its not wrong if we (the Party) finally get to do it properly. FLOORWARD!

Ok, lets tap the brakes here just a second... if no amendment is absolute, then the 16 amendment is also not absolute.

If collection of income taxes from the rich goes into the "just say NO" pile, who's going to pay for all of my free stuff?

Dear me, if no amendment is absolute, then what about the 21st amendment repealing the 18th amendment (Prohibition)? Which amendment is more (or less) absolute than the other? This is all so confusing.

The very concept of an Amendment is sexist. It should be an Awomyndwomynt. But wait, even that might be a genderist distortion of the science of biology, so it really should be Aneutdeunucht or maybe just ADT, but that's already taken (appropriated) by the Home Security company, which is an inherent discrimination against the homeless, so perhaps it should be ALGTBQDLGTBQT, but that's too hard to pronounce. What about ANON or ANNUL or AVOID? Where/who is the Czar of Language when we need him/her/it/them?

--KOOK ... By the way, my pronouns are amateurnouns or perhaps semi-pronouns or perhaps connouns.