Image

People's Movie Review: 'V' stands for 'Vapid'

Image
The names of many things start with "V." In fact, one of my FAVORITE things starts with a "V." After watching "V for Vendetta," I felt just like my favorite thing after a wild drunken Saturday night. How is that, you say? Well, my friends, after watching "V" I felt royally f*cked and violated.

This movie is not just bad, it is worse. I am changing the English language to allow the statement "this is a worse movie," for "V" is and will be worse than any movie anyone anywhere might make in the future.

But enough of the name calling -- let's get to the film (without revealing too many plot details). In future England (approximately 2015?), the Government controls the news media, the Koran is outlawed, and homosexuals are wantonly murdered for their sexuality. Terrorists are freedom fighters, military personnel are murderers, and mention is made of the Iraq and Afghani conflicts, as well as new ones in Syria.

In one classic moment of propaganda, a homosexual character shows Natalie Portman his hidden chamber of anti-Government paraphernalia, and we see an anti-war poster. It is the English flag with a swastika in the middle and the words "coalition of the willing" written upon it! Now, where have I seen that phrase before?

In the end, this film is the typical liberal propaganda piece, in which victimhood is taken to new heights. In the world we live in now, the media tries to control our Government (Dan Rather and Ted Turner anyone?), gays and lesbians try to control our culture (Brokeback Transamerica Capote anyone?) and Muslim terrorists blow up subway stations while the Koran is protected with armed guards. How the current world morphed into one in which the Koran, gays and lesbians are outlawed and the Government controlls the media is beyond me.

Let me tell you all a more interesting and frightening story. In the real future England, taxes are high, Muslims are gaining control, the media is subversive and in control of the Government, Gays and Lesbians are still powerful but wary of the Islamic movement, and the rest of the people are depressed.

I give "V for Victims" four people's cubes for propaganda value.

UPDATE!

Endorsed by Michael Moore!

This movie exposes the true evil of the United States and its capitalist hegemony. I actually had the pleasure of interviewing its star Natalie Portman I think you guys will appreciate it. Natalie Portman Interview

User avatar
Idiots! "V" is for "Vagina" as in "Vagina Monologues". When is this site ever going to get Progressive?

User avatar
Man, and I thought the guys who made that movie were okay... so much for the "Matrix" creators being cool....

Der Kommissar Betty,

One of them Andy Wachowski is now a She-male called Linda. Not kidding, wish I was, but I'm not.

associatecontributor1 wrote:Der Kommissar Betty,

One of them Andy Wachowski is now a She-male called Linda. Not kidding, wish I was, but I'm not.

It is obvious that you feel superior to this sexually confused artist. since he is an artist, however, he will go to a re education camp where this issue will be "discussed" with a few dozen minors, you know, the ones with the shovels.

try not to feel superior. remember VI lenin's quote on the usefull idiot.

besides, at my party, he said he was mary

viva che!

User avatar
This cinematic masterpiece surely puts Leni Riefenstahls "Triumph of the Will" to shame...... CommieWood has surely out did itself. And did you see Bush, see how he has aged, he looks like John Hurt now. How did they get video of Bushler on the White House mega-tele-screen anyways??? I am happy that my annual re-education was done in a two hour stretch instead of visiting the Gulag, atleast I can eat something at the theater.... Not that I am complaining!!! No no, I love the gulag like any progressive does!!! I was just saying you know, popcorn is good and and..... I love the gulag!!! Please dont send me back....

THE PARTY PREVAILS......

Comrade,

I'll be sure to recommend it for this year's May Day film festival. The class enemies at the New Yorker have joined the capitalist hegemony in denouncing this courageous piece of cinema.

Who might it appeal to? “Matrix” lovers, certainly. And the movie's sullen, chain-clanking atmosphere connects with punk, Goth, grunge, and all the doomy tones of white teen rock for the past three decades. For aging kids stoned on pop rapture, it could be a trip. And for people driven mad by the ineptitude and folly of the Bush Administration this film may seem like a brazen romp. Only the West could have made a movie in which blowing up civic temples is a “provocative” media statement.

The country “doesn't need a building,” V says. “It needs an idea.” Yes, but “Vendetta” doesn't have any ideas, except for a misbegotten belief in cleansing acts of violence. How strangely doth pop make its murderous way, as V might say. The quarter-century-old disgruntled fantasies of two English comic-book artists, amplified by a powerful movie company, and ambushed by history, wind up yielding a disastrous muddle.

https://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinem ... rci_cinema

User avatar
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/v_for_vendetta/

Rotten Tomatoes, on the other hand, have given the movie 75% rating based on reviews by paid, professional critics (if a newspaper like SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER wants to pay someone for a movie review, it's got to be good).

This is pure post-9/11 Orwell, a great, angry screed against scapegoating and fearmongering in the seemingly endless war on terrorism.

Admittedly, some of the allusions skewer more toward the Nazi regime than the Republican Party (though many will persuasively argue that they're one and the same).

A divided domestic electorate will take [it] either as a kick-***, future-punk primal scream of political frustration or as an irresponsible, literally and figuratively incendiary attack on our...approval-deficient leaders.

May be the ballsiest, angriest picture of the current administration.

The Wachowskis are back and Rush Limbaugh will not be amused.

And even those critics who didn't like the movie have an even greater disdain for the Bush administration

In the end V for Vendetta is as cold and unsympathetic as the regime it criticizes.

User avatar
Maybe Mel Gibson & Clint Eastwood can do a movie.......?

The 1st scene opens ....The year is 2018, the month is July, the setting is NYC. It is the eighth year of Islamofascist rule after the 2nd Clinton co-presidency was nuclear blackmailed by Iran. Sharia law is ruthlessly enforced. The public has become accustomed to the public hangings and beheadings of homosexuals in Mecca Square (formerly Union Square). The economy is in shambles. The time is five in the afternoon, everything comes to screeching halt. Buses and taxis unload and everybody gets out their prayer mats and gets down on the 120 degree pavement and faces east. The public loudspeakers on every block calls the population to mandatory prayer.
But in the surrounding countryside throughout the Islamic States, a resistence movement is growing.........

I just love how you commies get all upset whenever someone offends your beloved Bush. THAT'S RIGHT, I SAID BUSH!!! You think that one big-government stooge (Bush) is somehow more noble than another big-government stooge (Kerry). You think that being subversive against the government is inherently a bad thing? Well you're not the only one. Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, and others thought the same thing. Here's what I really despise about this website (and its sister site, Communists for Kerr). You actually think that the Republican party is about limited government and free-market capitalism. This in spite of Bush's ballooning deficiet, Patriot Act, raising of tariffs, energy bill, Medicare Bill, etc. as well as the Republican Party's own traditionally Mercantilist (which itself is just National Socialism) economic policies and rampant militarism (which itself creates blowback, weakens real defense at home, and creates a cloak for the government's own expansion and destruction of liberty. Government is inherently the enemy of liberty, the bigger it grows. It doesn't matter who's in charge, whether Kerry or Bush. Here's comes a film about an anarchist and you thrash it as if it's communist, despite the inherent statism of the Soviet Union. Wake up and smell some real coffee. Bush is just as much a "People's Leader" as Hillary would be.

Also, do yourself a favor and read "The Bush Betrayal" by James Bovard

Dear "Mr. Huh"

I enjoyed your writing. Did you have a hand in the screenplay for "V for Vendetta?" If not, you should contact the Washowskis -- they could use a brilliant man like you.

User avatar
Mr.huh? wrote:Bush is just as much a "People's Leader" as Hillary would be.

You mean Bush isn't a male version of Ayn Rand? Oh my, now I'll have to check all my premises.

User avatar
Dear Mr. Huh?

This is a satire and humor site

This is a satire and humor site

This is a satire and humor site

This is a satire and humor site

You have an "Irony" deficiency problem. Take some Irony vitamins.

Humble and lovable,
Laika

The Haliburton pigs have sent there goons to defame this great movie on imdb.com as well look at this slanderous rubbish:

Author: jonbg from United Kingdom

I have just seen this at a private screening and was hoping for great things. The general consensus was - How on earth did this get made??? 'V' is easily the longest 2 hours 10 minutes I've ever spent in a cinema. The whole thing is very short on action, and ridiculously long on tedium. A colleague I saw it with - an apolitical Australian - dubbed it 'The worst film I have ever seen..' He wasn't alone.

Where to start?

1/. Well, FOUR script writers. And not one of them with a decent writing credit to their name. Yes, I know there are loads of sad guys with no girlfriends out there, who think The Matrix is a work of mystical genius. It isn't. It is a film that stupid people think is clever. 'V' is the same, but without the good bits. I haven't read the comic novel on which it's based, but I understand the author has disassociated himself from it. AFter five minutes you can see why. From the off we are hit with ranting, heavy-handed, pretentious, meaningless drivel masquerading as commentary or satire, or allegory? God only knows. But given the hysteria of the writing teams' message, you wonder what sort of government such rabid parochialists would form given the chance.. What is obvious, after an interminable first third is: THE SCRIPT IS A MESS. The writers cannot tell a story and leave vast holes in the plot. My guess is they had neither the money, nor the will, to hire a decent script doctor. It would have been expensive.

2/. Hugo Weaving in a rubbish mask is irritating after two minutes. After two HOURS, you've lost the will to live. 'Hey Larry (and the other one). PLASTIC MASKS CAN'T ACT. They're static, and in movies, static=boring. But even his fight scenes were badly choreographed and badly directed.

3/. The whole film looks like it was made for TV. The first scene has a set like a 1970s Hammer horror. We in Britain were used to this sort of thing 20 years ago. Is London supposed to be desolate and oppressed as it would be under a totalitarian regime? If so, what was the production designer doing?

4/. What year is it set in? It's meant to be 20-30 years in the future and yet the police are still using old Dell computers, driving five year old Rovers and using current mobile phones. Details like these added to the veneer of cheapness.

5/. Plot. In Wachowskis' England there is one family, one grotty pub, two policeman who live in an office, five politicians and this girl - Ms Portman - whose parents have been killed by an evil totalitarian government because they protested against the war or something. But the government are bioterrorists experimenting on dissidents until one day there's a big explosion (not sure why) and then a nerve agent kills 100,000 people, (or is it 80,000, we get told both figures) which is falsely pinned on Muslim extremists and then John Hurt becomes Hitler on a chat show and we've still got an hour to go..... I MEAN IT IS SO MUCH JUVENILE RUBBISH. How old are these writers?

6/. Actors. Natalie Portman. Yes, she does a perfectly decent job with a script so full of holes and containing so many terrible lines you actually feel for her. Her accent was fine and I hope she got paid well for this, because she is at sea with this ludicrous script. Scarlett Johanssen and Bryce Dallas Howard - count yourselves lucky. John Hurt is great in these sorts of roles (Contact) Here he was terrible. One dimensional, shouty nonsense does not a performance make. Not in the least bit convincing, or unlikeable. The other bit part actors were pretty low rent, you don't even see them on TV in the UK. Even Stephen Rea was laughable on occasion.

7/. OK, what is the point? Governments are evil? Totalitarianism is a bit unpleasant? Revolution will save us all? Or worse - and I think this is what our angst-ridden writers are getting at - 9/11 was a Bush plot. How original. Simplistic, Hollywood liberalism is eating itself alive right there, up on the screen.....

8/. Cheap, cheap, cheap. 'V' for Vendetta cost $50m. Natalie aside, the acting is so second rate you know the budget didn't go there, the production values were sub made for TV standard, there are no Matrix sfx to speak of, so I guess the cash went on blowing up the Houses of Parliament (still not quite sure why) and shutting down St James' on a Monday night. $50m is cheap by Batman Begins standards. But it looks like it cost half that. And BB is a ten times the film this mess is. The good side? It will make money for fat Joel and his band tedious fat cats.

9/. Do we really need a movie for spotty, Chomsky groupies? The downside of the web has been the growth of the conspiracy theory racket. This has always been lucrative Wachowski territory and their constituency will flock to this nonsense and proclaim it a work of genius. For these people, movies like this aren't really entertainment, they are a confirmation of their own simplistic, childish beliefs in scenarios created out of low self-esteem, paranoia, social failure, limited intellect and laziness. This one's for them.

10/. V for Vendetta commits the greatest crime in movies. It is boring. Bad story telling is boring. Bad preaching is boring, bad acting is boring. This has all three. I was a guest at the screening I saw so I couldn't leave, and had to watch the whole thing. Someone behind me summed it up. With 30 minutes to go, they hissed 'For the love of God. End now.'

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0434409/us ... ?start=200

User avatar
Mr.huh? wrote:I just love how you commies get all upset whenever someone offends your beloved Bush.

I do get offended.... you have no idea how much time and effort I put into watering and fertilizing that bush, I mean it cost almost all my monthly ration cards and a color screen TV I gave to the local Party official as a bribe to allow me to plant it.... You are a very mean person Mr. Huh and you should take into consideration the plight of the proletarian.....

Chairman Meow-Say-Pun wrote:
Mr.huh? wrote:I just love how you commies get all upset whenever someone offends your beloved Bush.

I do get offended.... you have no idea how much time and effort I put into watering and fertilizing that bush, I mean it cost almost all my monthly ration cards and a color screen TV I gave to the local Party official as a bribe to allow me to plant it.... You are a very mean person Mr. Huh and you should take into consideration the plight of the proletarian.....

Now that's some good humor there. In all seriousness though, you'll have to forgive me if I came off a little rabid. You are right that the main character in the movie is a terroist. Keep in mind though, this movie was based upon a graphic novel that was written in the 1930's. Part of its popular allure is the fact that it has a conflicting morality play in it. Who do you vote for when both parties are bad? And no, Bush isn't a male version of Ayn Rand. In fact, most of the Republican Party isn't. The Republican party has its roots and very history in Mercantilism, which itself is an economic policy akin to National Socialism. Lincoln himself spent his whole political career pursuing subsidies for railroad companies and was heavily infuenced by Leo Strauss, whom himself was hardly a classical liberal.

You are right that the main character in the movie is a terroist. Keep in mind though, this movie was based upon a graphic novel that was written in the 1930's.

Its amazing to think such a glorious work was published fifty years before it was published. A very creative revision of history I suppose next you will argue that Japan was trying to surrender the whole summer before we dropped the a bomb on them.

Wikipedia thinks differently on the matter though,

V for Vendetta was originally published between 1982 and 1985, in black and white, in Warrior, a British anthology comic. The strip was one of the most popular in the title and featured on several covers during the 26 issues of Warrior.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta

So the the democrats and republicans have been around long enough for guilt by association with mercantilism, that's great. NAFTA doesn't strike me as very mercantilistic though.

V for Vendetta started with concept in writing in 1981. It was published mostly in 1983, and after a hiatus, 1988.

Also, V was Valerie. Yes, V is a member of the transgendered community. WHAT A PROGRESSYVE!

User avatar
"V" is for "Valium". A friend told me it put her to sleep in a mind numbing way.

<i>Exposition, exposition, exposition, exposition, exposition, symbolism really hammered in, exposition, exposition, exposition, exposition, symbolism really hammered in, exposition, end.</i>

I don't remember if they showed the movie or just scrolled the script across the screen.

User avatar
Lincoln himself spent his whole political career pursuing subsidies for railroad companies and was heavily infuenced by Leo Strauss, whom himself was hardly a classical liberal.

Mr. Huh, I am sorry, but you must be a Harvard graduate who majored in revisionist history. Your facts are really messed up my good sir. Facts that are messed up to the point that I fear for the future of our country (even more so than I already do.) Leo Strauss was born in 1899 in Germany, Lincoln (And I assume you are talking about Abraham Lincoln) died in 1865. Now how in the world was Lincoln influenced by Strauss? Perhaps through the miracle of time travel or perhaps the magic of rewriting history for the sake of educating the future brainwashed progressives of tomorrow. And I will second the fact that V for Vendetta was written in the 80's (as opposed to you saying it was done in the 30's) and it was made to criticize the Thatcher conservative government and re-made today as a second rate movie to criticize the Bush Administration....

The Party Prevails Comrade Huh?, Keep educating the toiling masses in edit-copy-past history...

User avatar
Chairman Meow-Say-Pun wrote:Leo Strauss was born in 1899 in Germany, Lincoln (And I assume you are talking about Abraham Lincoln) died in 1865. Now how in the world was Lincoln influenced by Strauss?

I think Mr. Huh has confused Leo Strauss with Levi Strauss. Levi Strauss was a contemporary of Lincoln.

User avatar
I would thank you $.$. Halliburton for clarifying that for me, but you are still a class enemy and detractor of the peoples liberation the world over...... I denounce you.... (Tell Margeret I said hi)


User avatar
Good find, Genosse Von Trapp!

From Michael Moore's site:
https://michaelmoore.com/words/latestne ... hp?id=6298

March 23rd, 2006 10:32 am
‘Vendetta' a powerhouse

Examining the thin line between terrorist and hero.


David Koon / Arkansas Times

Though it's not very popular to say so in America these days, it's as true as it ever was: One man's “terrorist” is another man's “freedom fighter” — it all depends on who is wearing the jackboots.

A superb new film that explores the hair-thin line between hero and villain — especially when it comes to blowing things up for political aims — is “V for Vendetta.” A stunningly original and even profound movie from the Wachowski brothers (creators of “The Matrix” series), it's both a modern-day swashbuckling tale and a none-too-subtle commentary on Bush-era governance by fear, one sure to spur debate among both comic book freaks and political science professors.
[...]

Ivan Denisovich wrote:
You are right that the main character in the movie is a terroist. Keep in mind though, this movie was based upon a graphic novel that was written in the 1930's.

Its amazing to think such a glorious work was published fifty years before it was published. A very creative revision of history I suppose next you will argue that Japan was trying to surrender the whole summer before we dropped the a bomb on them.

Wikipedia thinks differently on the matter though,

V for Vendetta was originally published between 1982 and 1985, in black and white, in Warrior, a British anthology comic. The strip was one of the most popular in the title and featured on several covers during the 26 issues of Warrior.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta

So the the democrats and republicans have been around long enough for guilt by association with mercantilism, that's great. NAFTA doesn't strike me as very mercantilistic though.

The original V for Vendetta was an attack on the Thatcher administration. It was basically because she gave a swift kick in the nuts of Union Miners while she was in office. She wanted to privatize many of the state run businesses. What I found odd about the original "V" is that the writer must not have known that Thatcher fought for gay rights in the late 60s. I guess if that fact was realized angsty gay goth kids everywhere would have one less thing to pointlessly brood over.

User avatar
Mr. Koon made a rather damaging error to his argument, I included the next paragraph of the article with my favorite passage in bold red (please read).

From Michael Moore's site:
https://michaelmoore.com/words/latestne ... hp?id=6298

March 23rd, 2006 10:32 am
‘Vendetta' a powerhouse

Examining the thin line between terrorist and hero.

David Koon / Arkansas Times

Though it's not very popular to say so in America these days, it's as true as it ever was: One man's “terrorist” is another man's “freedom fighter” — it all depends on who is wearing the jackboots.

A superb new film that explores the hair-thin line between hero and villain — especially when it comes to blowing things up for political aims — is “V for Vendetta.” A stunningly original and even profound movie from the Wachowski brothers (creators of “The Matrix” series), it's both a modern-day swashbuckling tale and a none-too-subtle commentary on Bush-era governance by fear, one sure to spur debate among both comic book freaks and political science professors.

Though I've heard more than one critic say that “V for Vendetta” is set in a parallel universe Britain in which the Nazis won World War II, the careful viewer will soon see there's nothing so fantastic as that going on. Instead, what we are presented is a very real world of possibly 20 years from now — one that crash-landed at the bottom of the slippery slope of trading safety for freedom in the era of terrorism. With the United States long since consumed by a mysterious virus and civil war, Britain has devolved into a totalitarian state of zealots, book burners and TV zombies, all ruled by Chancellor-for-life Adam Sutler (the suitably slimy John Hurt). With Sutler keeping power by way of black-booted thug squads and cronies at the television station, it's a terrifying place, one where homosexuals, critics, malcontents and the otherwise different disappear in the middle of the night and are never seen again.
[...]

I couldnt agree more with Mr. Koon, trading safety for freedom in the era of terrorism is a "slippery slope" that will lead to a totalitarian future 20 years down the road... A MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALIST TOTALITARIAN FUTURE. Thank-you Mr. Koon for making our point so eloquently well put. (obviously a mistake on his part)

--Chairman Meow

Chairman Meow-Say-Pun wrote:Mr. Koon made a rather damaging error to his argument, I included the next paragraph of the article with my favorite passage in bold red (please read).

From Michael Moore's site:
https://michaelmoore.com/words/latestne ... hp?id=6298

March 23rd, 2006 10:32 am
‘Vendetta' a powerhouse

Examining the thin line between terrorist and hero.

David Koon / Arkansas Times

Though it's not very popular to say so in America these days, it's as true as it ever was: One man's “terrorist” is another man's “freedom fighter” — it all depends on who is wearing the jackboots.

A superb new film that explores the hair-thin line between hero and villain — especially when it comes to blowing things up for political aims — is “V for Vendetta.” A stunningly original and even profound movie from the Wachowski brothers (creators of “The Matrix” series), it's both a modern-day swashbuckling tale and a none-too-subtle commentary on Bush-era governance by fear, one sure to spur debate among both comic book freaks and political science professors.

Though I've heard more than one critic say that “V for Vendetta” is set in a parallel universe Britain in which the Nazis won World War II, the careful viewer will soon see there's nothing so fantastic as that going on. Instead, what we are presented is a very real world of possibly 20 years from now — one that crash-landed at the bottom of the slippery slope of trading safety for freedom in the era of terrorism. With the United States long since consumed by a mysterious virus and civil war, Britain has devolved into a totalitarian state of zealots, book burners and TV zombies, all ruled by Chancellor-for-life Adam Sutler (the suitably slimy John Hurt). With Sutler keeping power by way of black-booted thug squads and cronies at the television station, it's a terrifying place, one where homosexuals, critics, malcontents and the otherwise different disappear in the middle of the night and are never seen again.
[...]

I couldnt agree more with Mr. Koon, trading safety for freedom in the era of terrorism is a "slippery slope" that will lead to a totalitarian future 20 years down the road... A MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALIST TOTALITARIAN FUTURE. Thank-you Mr. Koon for making our point so eloquently well put. (obviously a mistake on his part)

--Chairman Meow

You are right the only way we can truly be safe is if bend over and take it like a champ from Iran!!!!!!! Thank Marx that Michael Moore has his own website!!!!!

Don't forget.
Democrats for Clooney and Sheen in '08!!!!!!

No Treason
Lysander Spooner, 1867, Part I



INTRODUCTORY.

The question of treason is distinct from that of slavery; and is the same that it would have been, if free States, instead of slave States, had seceded.

On the part of the North, the war was carried on, not to liberate slaves, but by a government that had always perverted and violated the Constitution, to keep the slaves in bondage; and was still willing to do so, if the slaveholders could be thereby induced to stay in the Union.

The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals.

====================

For the remaining parts, check out lysanderspooner.com

"Who said anything about nobility? Bush may be a socialist scumbag who's incapable of recognizing that Islam is the real enemy, but at least he isn't an isolationist retard like his competition."

If by competition, you mean Kerry, than Kerry is hardly an isolationist. Keep in mind that it was "progressives" who started America's foreign interventions. And Kerry has hardly been in support of withdrawing from the UN and other various international governing bodies. Isolationism as a foreign policy doesn't breed evil, it still lets private citizens travel and even support revolutions for freedom in their own land. Classical liberals were wise in supporting limited governments that only concentrate on their own area and don't engage in each other's affairs, since interventionism only leads to crisis, which leads to the growth of government.

"The Republican party was, for several decades, the party of slower growing government and a slightly less hampered market, which is preferable to all the alternatives with the exception of the LP"

Slower government growth only leads to big government eventually.

"Anarchosocialism isn't anarchism, and neither is dhimmitude. Whatever you call it, slavery is slavery, and that is precisely what the makers of the film want."

No argument there.

"Have you considered that maybe most Americans just don't care? Only about 20% of the colonists were Patriots, about 20% were Loyalists, and the rest didn't give a shit either way. Very little has changed in the past two centuries; most people care more about American Idol than about American politics. The irony is, it's the market's fault for making everyone's lives so damn easy."

I never said that there was anything wrong with the market making people's lilves easier, but its government schools that make them so dunderheaded and passive in regards to the government's usurpation of power and subsequent corruption of it.

"No, what weakens defense at home is the government's prohibition on the sale of military hardware to regular people, and its various other measures for keeping us disarmed."

Good point there. 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened for instance if pilots were allowed to carry firearms on their planes. However, if you're going to have a standing military in order to defend the country against terroist attacks, it can't do so if it's stationed in numerous military bases across the globe on foreign soil instead.

"This is a satire and humor site"

I understand that, which is what makes rather brilliant when it attacks Democrats, but when it then tries to hold up the Republican party as being a party of individualism and then implies that the Patriot Act is needed by satirically pointing out that it "infringes on the rights of terroists to blow people up" (never mind that fact that it infringes on everyone's rights to do or say anyting by denying them a fair trial. If the government wants to use emminent domain to tear down your house and use the land for a strip mall and you don't want to, then all the government has to do in order to hide their real intentions is to declare you a terroist and throw you in Guantanamo Bay since you won't have a trial which might expose the truth), then it becomes a mockery of itself. Also, while this is a humor and satire site, this review was hardly satirical, but rather serious.

You see the movie "Matrix" was mis-titled it was originally supposed to be titled the "Marxist".

This movie opened my eyes to the realization that terrorists are cool and terrorist acts are the only way to solve the problems of the world instead of voting. That Voting is not cool and that being an anarchist is really really really cool.

That Islam is being repressed by Christians (of course the same could never happen in Islamic run countries to Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and Jews). Everyone knows that all the problems in the world is because of Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Christians repress Islam. Islam is the religion of PEACE, my teacher in school told me this as he went on a tirade against the evils of Bush. My teacher told me that Bush and Blair are the only TRUE terrorists. My teacher is really really really cool and showed us this movie in class paid by taxes by all the little Eichmanns.

When the Islam and Anarchists come together to defeat the evils of Capitalism we will join hands and skip in an open field of daisies. Because we will understand each other and live in bliss and peace. Gay people will all be treated with respect and love under Islam and Socialism.


*of course the movie never explains who Guy Fox was, the mask that Vendetta used. Guy Fox was a CONSERVATIVE CATHOLIC. Guy Fox wanted to turn England back towards a more conservative CHRISTIAN CATHOLIC COUNTRY. In other words he was the same thing that the movie makers did not like in the movie...oh I guess they forgot to mention who Guy Fox was.

Then again that might be a lie made up by the KKKarl Rove Smear Machine to discredit and "Swiftboat" Guy Fox and this courages piece of art.

Wow...doesn't KKKarl Rove ever take a break from his evil plotting???

User avatar
Rich333 wrote:
Laika the Space Dog wrote:Maybe Mel Gibson & Clint Eastwood can do a movie.......?

The 1st scene opens ....The year is 2018, the month is July, the setting is NYC. It is the eighth year of ....

I've been thinking for at least the past year that our side needs to start putting out our own films; no one wants to watch the crap that's been coming out of Hollywood recently anyway, so the market's wide open. I've got $2k on hand to back the production of the film you've just described.

Comrade Rich333,

It is a brilliant ploy, funding a subversive revolutinary group to produce devious cinematic works to give the lie to the Big Lie. Unfortunately, although technology allows for ever more media designers to produce works without the need for massive capital and to distribute said works inexpensively online, the big studios still remain, well, the Big Studios. Not too long ago I had read, perhaps in the pages of the Socialist Truth Purveyor, aka NY Times, that Hollywood had come to the realization that, although Americans are increasingly spurning Hollywood fare, the increased consumption abroad more than compensates. Thus Hollywood has no reason to change from continuing to spread the work of Comrade Lenin, Praise Be Unto Him (sorry, wrong murderous guiding figure).

I have no facts, no numbers, but what does it matter, Comrade? I am among friends, and I am a Socialist Reality Truth Creator, 2nd Class, from Pyongyang.

And if you dare to question me, I can make your Socialist reality become much more real for you, here in the DPRK.

WOW
... you're an idiot, you should really just end it all. you gave it a good run, but it doesn't seem like you have much more to contribute to life in general. goodnight.

User avatar
That was like, a 2 year lag period between those comments. Cool!

User avatar
Don't be judgmental, Betty. Some people need more time to formulate their opinions than others. But in the end, everyone's opinion is equally valid. It's like solving the People's Cube puzzle. I wonder what comrade WOW's best record in working on the cube? If he does it at his own pace, a little at a time after work and sometimes on weekends, I'd say two years at the most.

Laika the Space Dog wrote:Maybe Mel Gibson & Clint Eastwood can do a movie.......?

Buses and taxis unload and everybody gets out their prayer mats and gets down on the 120 degree pavement and faces east. The public loudspeakers on every block calls the population to mandatory prayer.

We do not face east! when we pray to the child molesting criminal .....

WE FACE NEWARK!!

(it is fairly kewl it has been two years)

confirm distance to target

one ping only

User avatar
W007!!1!!

He's back! We missed you, one ping only. How long have you been missing? I lost count.

Premier Betty wrote:W007!!1!!

He's back!

i am truly honored.

no one has taken any notice of me (which is correct pc) since my mother ( a sex criminal and failed communist) said ..

wipe your nose already yakov!

it has been trying under putin, even for an udervasser comarde.

a word to the wise: YOU LOVE BLACK TURTLE NECKS

confirm distance to target

one (quiet) ping only

User avatar
We have taken notice. And we are glad you have returned to the collective. Once again communism proves that no one can resist!

User avatar
I think i shall take my limo to the premier of this great new movie.


Image



User avatar
you dont like the Peoples Craftsmanship?


Image
here's the link, and No its not a Post Apocalyptic Towncar.

User avatar
I never said I didn't like it, it's just... strange looking. I still prefer the Party Approved H2 stretch limos.

User avatar
Wow, that a Ukrainian Limo! I didn't know they had sunk so low as to cater to bourgeois decadence of Party elites with home-made products. The rule is that all decadent things must come from the West, otherwise it creates a confusion and sends mixed signals to the masses.

User avatar
englishrussia is a great website, LoneRedStar! Glad to see others go there. I've stolen many of my best ideas from that place.



 
POST REPLY