There's so much talk of Love and Hate these days. It called for making an instructional video.

Written by Oleg Atbashian. Narrated, animated, and produced by James Lorenz.

Is it just me, or do you also wonder how liberals can possibly function, let alone win elections? This lump in their heads, they refer to it as a mind, is made of absurdities, inconsistencies and contradictions.

How is possible to hold so many mutually exclusive beliefs?

• To espouse non-violence - and commit violent acts.
  
• To cheer gays - and then speak glowingly of those nations who murder them.
  
• To denounce corruption - and then vote for the corrupt.
  
• To demand love - and be full of hate.

The fact is there's a method to their insanity and sane people will keep losing to the insane unless they understand what that method is.
~
Let's take love and hate. Scientists have discovered that both love and hate originate in the same nervous circuits in the brain. You can measure them physically. But they're even more connected metaphysically. One is the flipside of the other, like 2 sides of the same coin.

There can't be a coin with one side bigger than the other, so the amounts of love and hate are always equal. In fact, they're not even two different emotions. They're the same human emotion, positive on the front and negative on the back. The bigger the love, the bigger the hate. The smaller the hate, the smaller the love. A total absence of hate means a total absence of love. You might as well be a vegetable.

If you love something you hate anything that threatens the thing you love. If you love your child, you hate anything that endangers it. If you love your country, you hate those who mean to harm it. But if you hate your country, you love those who mean it harm.

Leftists will tell you they want a total victory for love and a total elimination of hate. They've made hate a crime. They think the human mind is a pliable, social construct that can be pinched and squeezed into conformity. They think they can improve human nature by criminalizing human thoughts.

Don't be fooled by their broad and generic pleas for this so-called love. Those pleas focus strictly on removing hate for a socialist utopia. I have yet to hear a plea from progressives to stop hating and start loving enemies of socialism.

To the contrary, the so-called love crowd shows no restraint in hating anyone they see as a threat to their utopia. They gang up on their opponents to demonize and demoralize their supporters. They use terms invented solely for this purpose, like micro-aggression and hate speech.

What is the difference between love and hate? Which one is a plus, and which one a minus? Well that depends on where you stand. One person's hate group is another's love group. One person's hate speech is another's love speech.

This is not an exercise in moral relativism. One person's hate crime cannot be another's love crime. They're mutually exclusive. To a conservative a crime is a crime, regardless of the motive. But if you're a progressive, you make a distinction. A hate crime requires a harsher punishment. But if you believe hate crimes call for a harsher punishment then you must believe that there can be love crimes that call for a lighter punishment, or can be excused altogether.

Like Bill Ayers' youthful terrorism in the 1960's. The communist leader of weather underground organized several bombings that killed and maimed innocent people. Instead of going to prison, Bill became an eminent educator, writing books on how to teach social justice to our children. Why? Apparently it was only a love crime as opposed to standard murder. As a love crime it deserved forgiveness. That's of course if you're a progressive, like Barack Obama, who launched his political career in Bill Ayers' house.

Che Guevara was a cold-blooded murderer. But if you ask a leftist, he killed out of great love for the people. Ok then, let's file those murders under love crimes as well. Che t-shirts for everyone!

Many on the left excused the soviet regime murdering and jailing millions of people. “They did it for the common good” they'll tell you. Ok then, that's 74 years of continuous love crimes.

Let's wave that red flag, put on our Che t-shirts and go protest those hate groups.

And that's the method to their insanity.

Now you know.

Excellent work!

It was probably necessary to shorten the list of contradictions in the beginning so as not to overwhelm the video, but I still like my original full list:

How is possible to hold so many mutually exclusive beliefs?

• To preach tolerance and be so intolerant?
  
• To grieve for terror victims and justify terrorism?
  
• To stand up for workers and destroy their jobs?
  
• To march for peace and defend the militants?
  
• To denounce corruption and vote for the corrupt?
  
• To espouse non-violence and commit violent acts?
  
• To speak of liberties and promote government dictate?
  
• To bolster feminism and deride successful women?
  
• To cheer gays and aid the gay-bashers in the Middle East?
  
• To champion minorities as a group and hold them down as individuals?
  
• To care about the children and mutilate their minds?
  
• To denounce guns and hire armed bodyguards?
  
• To support the troops and side with their murderers?
  
• To demand love and be full of hate?

Yes! Yes! Outstanding psychoanalysis of some outstanding anal psychotics.
A few of my favorites.
- Guns don't make us safe, surround themselves with armed security.

-Tolerate diversity and tolerance only if you think and act like they do.

-The unborn aren't human, they're really kangaroos.

-Denounce SUVs as gas guzzler polluters, travel in private jets.

-Islam is a religion of peace.

-Raising taxes creates jobs

-The election is not rigged, you're just losing. Until THEY lose.Speaking of global warmi...I mean climate change.

There's an old Chinese story called The Stone. I suppose you have to understand something about Taoism to understand the full meaning of the stone. The world of pleasure and pain is seen an illusion. To come to the full realization that the world and you are illusion and in actuality everything is One is to transcend the pain of the world and cease suffering.

But this turns your heart to stone.

In the cosmology of the Left the world of individuals is illusion too, and causes terrible pain and suffering. To transcend this world of illusion and see the world without the eyes of illusion, the false consciousness of individualism, is to attain the state of enlightenment.

And their hearts turn to stone. Because if individuality is illusion and everything is One collectively there is no such thing as pain and suffering, love and hate.

That always leads to the death of a person's very humanity. In Eastern religion and Western Marxism alike and for the same reasons it always turns hearts to stone.

Karl Marx Treatment Center wrote:That always leads to the death of a person's very humanity. In Eastern religion and Western Marxism alike and for the same reasons it always turns hearts to stone.

I thought about that, too. Where it says "you might as well be a vegetable" it might as well be a "zen buddhist." The word "haters" is a very loaded term, and just as nonsensical. But it does the job of dehumanizing the opponents, turning them into non-humans. As if all they have in their heart is hate.

Most people would hate to admit it, but it goes both ways.

Here's Che Guevara's quote: “A revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall!” (The Wall is a reference to the wall where Che's enemies stood before his firing squads).

All generalizations are lame. An old joke says, "people are generally divided into two categories: those who divide people into categories and those who don't." But we also tend to think in categories and there is no way escaping it. So here we go:

1. Some people love big ideas and hate those who stand in their way (revolutionaries).

2. Others love their personal comfort (mental or physical) and hate those who disrupt it (most Democrats, government workers, welfare recipients, establishment media, certain unions, career politicians, and other beneficiaries of the corrupt redistributive hierarchy that is now endangered by Trump's presidency).

They are the reactionaries and, paradoxically enough, in a detached semantic way, they are also today's "conservatives" trying to "conserve" the existing system that ensures their comforts.* They have more hate than anyone, while their great love of their personal comfort remains invisible under the radar.

3. There are also the drug addicts who have much in common with #2. You haven't seen a hater until you try to take the drugs away from a drug addict.
______________
* This is in contrast to the traditional "American conservatives" who are trying to conserve the revolutionary ideas of America's founding.

Karl Marx Treatment Center wrote:There's an old Chinese story called The Stone. I suppose you have to understand something about Taoism to understand the full meaning of the stone. The world of pleasure and pain is seen an illusion. To come to the full realization that the world and you are illusion and in actuality everything is One is to transcend the pain of the world and cease suffering.

But this turns your heart to stone.

In the cosmology of the Left the world of individuals is illusion too, and causes terrible pain and suffering. To transcend this world of illusion and see the world without the eyes of illusion, the false consciousness of individualism, is to attain the state of enlightenment.

And their hearts turn to stone. Because if individuality is illusion and everything is One collectively there is no such thing as pain and suffering, love and hate.

That always leads to the death of a person's very humanity. In Eastern religion and Western Marxism alike and for the same reasons it always turns [highlight=#FFFF00]hearts[/highlight] to stone.

Comrade,

A small korrektion:

"That always leads to the death of a person's very humanity. In Eastern religion and Western Marxism alike and for the same reasons it always turns hearts heads to stone."

“The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.” ~ G.K. Chesterton

Red Square wrote:

• To demand love and be full of hate?

I've always been mystified as to how they can cram so much hate into them ?
Is there a world quota of hate & these poor sods get what should have be spread over a hundred or more people ?
They also appear to want the opposite of the below .

Charlie Chaplin's Final Speech in The Great Dictator wrote:Soldiers! don't give yourselves to brutes - men who despise you - enslave you - who regiment your lives - tell you what to do - what to think and what to feel! Who drill you - diet you - treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men - machine men with machine minds and machine hearts! You are not machines! You are not cattle! You are men! You have the love of humanity in your hearts! You don't hate! Only the unloved hate - the unloved and the unnatural! Soldiers! Don't fight for slavery! Fight for liberty!

Comrade Squirrel, does not the head follow the heart?

My Lyudi wrote:Comrade Squirrel, does not the head follow the heart?

Comrade Lyudi,

I'm not sure. I suppose it depends (to some extent) on where one's head is located when the deliberation actually begins. For instance, we've all heard the phrase, "Get your head out of your ass" - but can you recall someone saying "Get your heart out of your ass"? (ref., Wikiquotes ¹) We must conclude, therefore, that although someone's head might follow their heart in one particular situation, it may be less likely to do so in another.

Nevertheless, you bring up a valid question - one that I wrestle with daily and have yet to develop a satisfactory answer. Thanks for the question, though - if it was a question - if not, thanks anyway!

CC

---------------------------------------------------------------

I think of Siddhartha and his interactions with the Ferryman. Here Siddhartha learns about things changing and remaining the same at once.

It is at the river that Siddhartha realizes he feels love for another person, his son, to whom he is a stranger. And through this, Siddhartha feels the pain of love as he accepts little Siddhartha's decision to leave.

Though I feel a level of hate for certain "children" these days - i.e. those who riot and attempt to demonize individuals, such as myself, for our beliefs - I also feel the pain of love for them. They are lost for now and being influenced by outside forces (George Soros etc.). They are, after all, my fellow humans. They are lost and there's nothing I, or anyone else, can do to stop them - just as Siddhartha could not stop his son from the path he chose.

Maybe one day they will realize they were in fact tricked into their rage. They may then develop a head / heart of stone and be forever enraged (like the 40 - 50 year old losers captured by Project Veritas discussing, with such glee, their ability to create buteric acid bombs to throw at an inauguration event). Or, they may realize that they have other options in life. I hope for their sake that if they are of the latter mindset that someone will give them an opportunity to create a new professional destiny. I for one see a satirical vision of employers in 5, 10... years having, as a requirement for employment, either never been a leftist militant snowflake or renouncing their militant snowflake past. Would you ever hire one of these creatures in their current state?

Heads or hearts of stone...or of compassion. Love or hate. Whichever becomes the reality for these lost souls - my mission is to attempt to ensure that my own children have an opportunity to realize the opportunities afforded to them by America. This is what drives me to attempt to influence the outcome.

That there are groups of people meddling in our present and future - groups of people who do seem to hate what we are - makes me love to hate shame them.

I wanted to post this video on Bombthrowers, and I decided to write a little intro, but it turned into a whole new essay. Here it is -

Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group

Styxhenxenhammer666 just put this video out. I've been watching him for a few months and I'm convinced that he operates on a higher level than most political commentators. He makes most "pundits" look like hacks.

I agree with him - that this insanity, in its current state, will likely pass. It gives me much pleasure to think of the societal retribution that will be handed down to those who hold onto their "Nazis are everywhere" personas.

I wasn't sure if I was the only one thinking about this over the last few weeks...

Love Crimes are breaking out all over. Ben Carson says his home was vandalized . . .. . . But that is a love crime because Ben Carson is on the wrong side of things. And he is really not black. Old Ben is demonstrably racist.

This can be confusing for the unenlightened. Let us assist you with our current color code.

Red Square wrote:

• To care about the children and mutilate their minds?

Or ... To care about the children and mutilate their bodies -- either in the womb to prevent them from being born or afterward to change their "gender identity."

All They Got Is Hate

[img]/images/LOVE_HATE_LOGO.jpg[/img]