Always a leader and FORWARD! thinker, President B. Hussein Obama last March, in a little noticed or publicized move, signed into law HR-347, the so-called "anti-protest-trespass" bill.
Both Socialist Party D and Socialist Party R voted strongly in favor of the bill, and frankly - why shouldn't they? Why should mere citizens have the legal right to protest, wave signs, or speak/shout in the presence of royalty? Deciding whether or not someone has violated the new law - a felony - will be determined by Secret Service personnel who are on the scene of the violation, which is as it should be since the SS essentially work directly for the President.
And FOR THE PEOPLE!!!
Quote:Under H.R. 347, which has more commonly been labeled the Trespass Bill by Congress, knowingly entering a restricted area that is under the jurisdiction of Secret Service protection can garner an arrest.
Ah, now all we have to do is to declare EVERYWHERE to be under the jurisdiction of Secret Service protection and we can do away with that useless First Amendment. Hey, are you engaging in rowdy protest by criticizing our beloved President Obama in your living room? Well, since your living room is a restricted area under the jurisdiction of Secret Service protection, YOU'RE UNDER ARREST!
The new symbol of freedom
Anyer MarxCan't we just have an executive order that gets rid of all of the whole little pesky book at once and be done with it?
Why, YES WE CAN! We just have Dear Leader™ don a pair of cheap N.Korean-made sun glasses and jump around like an asshole version of Max Headroom screaming "Gangman Chitcago Style".